CK 2998-1

So you mean that all the CK 2998 had to get the Base 1000, or only the first?

No doubt that some will kill to get this one. Credit picture: Phillips. Two things: The lume of the minute and hour hands is off. Not a big deal. The second thing is that I always thought the lollipop second hand came later, not on a Slash One. But I am n

hi all, First time posting on the Rolex forum although I have been a member for many years. I usually try and keep lowkey but do post on the JLC and Patek forums from time to time. Anyways, I am part of a chat group of passion watch collectors of whom sev

By Phillips, tomorrow. Not sure the insert is correct, but the watch is quite nice! I am very curious to see how it will end... Best, Nicolas

I have managed the series of four (quads) with a little bit of cheating substituting the 2915 with a 2998-1 with lollipop chrono second hand. Just as with the Three Musketeers, one has indeed to remember that they were actually four in the Broad Arrow fam

I am not a big Speedmaster fan, but when you fall on something like that, it is hard to resist. The dial is bewitching, the case is in great shape. The dustcover is present, and the insert is correct, as far as I know. But what makes all the appeal of thi

.....2913-lollipop.......165024 civilian.....2998-1........ I have a good lead on one of these.....and a possible lead on a second......but it may well be that this waits for 2015........who knows. Of course, this all begs another question...... 1019, 341

Omega like Rolex played an important function in measuring time. Here an early Speedmaster 2998-1. Hoping speedmasters are allowed for a change (following Panerai). Hope everyone had a good WE. Best Edmond

here's my 2998-1 from 1959